<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strongest Directories Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/08/13/the-strongest-directories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/08/13/the-strongest-directories/</link>
	<description>A blog about directories</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aviva</title>
		<link>http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/08/13/the-strongest-directories/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/08/13/the-strongest-directories/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Thanks for such a thoughtful write up!

I do agree with most of what you said.  It's a very useful tool, but obviously as with any tool, there are limitations.

Still, it has an element of objectivity in it that most directory lists don't have.  And it has helped me identify some directories that I didn't know about previously which are quite strong as well as other very popular directories that turn out not to be so strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for such a thoughtful write up!</p>
<p>I do agree with most of what you said.  It&#8217;s a very useful tool, but obviously as with any tool, there are limitations.</p>
<p>Still, it has an element of objectivity in it that most directory lists don&#8217;t have.  And it has helped me identify some directories that I didn&#8217;t know about previously which are quite strong as well as other very popular directories that turn out not to be so strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
