<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating a Profitable Directory Category Structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/06/30/creating-a-profitable-directory-category-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/06/30/creating-a-profitable-directory-category-structure/</link>
	<description>A blog about directories</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Directories Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Human Ranked Directory Review</title>
		<link>http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/06/30/creating-a-profitable-directory-category-structure/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Directories Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Human Ranked Directory Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directoriesblog.info/2006/06/30/creating-a-profitable-directory-category-structure/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>[...] 2. The not commercial categories and the categories that in most directories don&#8217;t receive a lot of submissions, like Art have very few subcategories while the commercial Categories like Business have a far more extensive subcategory structure. This is something that I generally agree with and I have talked about it previously in my category structure post. However I think in this case they have taken it a bit to the extreme. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. The not commercial categories and the categories that in most directories don&#8217;t receive a lot of submissions, like Art have very few subcategories while the commercial Categories like Business have a far more extensive subcategory structure. This is something that I generally agree with and I have talked about it previously in my category structure post. However I think in this case they have taken it a bit to the extreme. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
